We use cookies

Our website uses essential cookies and, with your consent, additional cookies to measure performance and improve our services. Cookie Policy.

You can change your choice at any time.

MMedXYNews
HomeVideos
MedXY AI/MedXY News/Section: Cardiology

Heart Failure Risk with Pregabalin vs Gabapentin: New Evidence for Chronic Pain Management in Older Adults

MedXY Editorial Team•Oct 1, 2025•Cardiology
Chronic Pain ManagementGabapentinheart failurePregabalin

Highlights

  • Pregabalin initiation is associated with a significantly higher risk of heart failure (HF) hospitalization or ED visits compared to gabapentin in older adults with chronic noncancer pain.
  • The risk is most pronounced in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease.
  • No significant difference in all-cause mortality was observed between groups.
  • Clinical decision-making should factor in HF risk when prescribing pregabalin, especially for vulnerable populations.

Study Background and Disease Burden

Chronic pain affects up to 30% of the population, especially in the elderly, and is a leading cause of disability and diminished quality of life. Nonopioid medications such as pregabalin and gabapentin are widely prescribed for neuropathic and musculoskeletal pain due to their efficacy and relatively favorable safety profile compared to opioids. However, both drugs, which act by binding to the α2δ subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels, have been linked to adverse cardiovascular effects in case reports. Notably, pregabalin exhibits greater binding potency than gabapentin, raising concerns about its potential for causing fluid retention and precipitating HF, particularly in older adults with multiple comorbidities. Given the prevalence of both chronic pain and heart failure in the Medicare population, clarifying the relative safety of these agents is a critical unmet need.

Study Design

This retrospective cohort study by Park et al. (JAMA Netw Open, 2025) analyzed U.S. Medicare data between January 1, 2015, and December 21, 2018. The study population included beneficiaries aged 65 to 89 years with chronic noncancer pain, explicitly excluding individuals with a history of heart failure or terminal illnesses. After careful selection, 246,237 patients were included: 18,622 new users of pregabalin and 227,615 new users of gabapentin. The cohort was predominantly female (66.8%) with a median age of 73 years (IQR 69–78).

The primary exposure was initiation of either pregabalin or gabapentin. The primary outcome was hospitalization or ED visit with a primary discharge diagnosis of heart failure. Secondary outcomes included outpatient HF diagnosis and all-cause mortality. To address confounding, the investigators used inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity scores derived from 231 covariates, including demographic, clinical, healthcare utilization, and medication variables.

Key Findings

During 114,113 person-years of follow-up, there were 1,470 primary endpoint events (hospitalization or ED visit for HF). The rate of HF was significantly higher among pregabalin users (18.2 per 1,000 person-years; 95% CI, 15.3–21.6) compared to gabapentin users (12.5 per 1,000 person-years; 95% CI, 11.9–13.2). The adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) for HF events with pregabalin versus gabapentin was 1.48 (95% CI, 1.19–1.77), indicating a 48% increased risk.

Subgroup analysis revealed even greater risk for patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease (AHR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.38–2.47). A modestly increased risk of outpatient HF diagnosis was also observed for pregabalin (AHR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.02–1.58). Importantly, all-cause mortality did not differ significantly between the groups (AHR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.95–1.76), suggesting that the excess HF risk does not translate into increased short-term mortality in this cohort.

A summary of the main results is provided in the table below:

Outcome Pregabalin (per 1,000 PY) Gabapentin (per 1,000 PY) Adjusted Hazard Ratio (AHR) 95% CI
Hospitalization/ED for HF 18.2 12.5 1.48 1.19–1.77
Hospitalization/ED for HF (with CVD history) — — 1.85 1.38–2.47
Outpatient HF Diagnosis — — 1.27 1.02–1.58
All-cause Mortality — — 1.26 0.95–1.76

These findings are robust given the comprehensive adjustment for confounders and the large sample size, providing credible evidence for differential cardiovascular risk.

Expert Commentary

The results align with prior mechanistic hypotheses: pregabalin’s higher affinity for the α2δ subunit can increase peripheral edema and fluid retention, both recognized contributors to heart failure decompensation. The risk signal is most pronounced in those with underlying cardiovascular disease, a subgroup already predisposed to HF events. Notably, the lack of excess mortality suggests that while the risk of HF events is higher, these do not immediately translate to poorer survival, though the clinical burden and healthcare utilization remain considerable.

Guidelines on chronic pain emphasize careful patient selection and risk assessment when prescribing adjuvant analgesics, particularly in older adults with multiple comorbidities. The present findings reinforce the need for heightened vigilance in this population, especially when considering pregabalin for patients with a history of cardiac disease.

Study limitations include potential residual confounding, reliance on administrative diagnosis codes, and lack of granular data on HF severity or ejection fraction. Nevertheless, the consistency of the findings across multiple endpoints and the size of the effect lend credibility to the conclusions.

Conclusion

In summary, this large retrospective cohort study demonstrates that initiation of pregabalin is associated with a significantly increased risk of heart failure events compared to gabapentin among older adults with chronic noncancer pain, particularly in those with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Clinicians should weigh these risks when choosing therapy and consider alternative agents or closer monitoring for high-risk patients. Further research should focus on elucidating the mechanisms and identifying which patients are most susceptible to adverse cardiac outcomes.

References

1. Park EE, Daniel LL, Dickson AL, Corriere M, Nepal P, Hall K, Plummer WD, Dupont WD, Murray KT, Stein CM, Ray WA, Chung CP. Initiation of Pregabalin vs Gabapentin and Development of Heart Failure. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2524451. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.24451 IF: 9.7 Q1 B12. Wiffen PJ, Derry S, Bell RF, et al. Gabapentin and pregabalin for chronic neuropathic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 9;6(6):CD007938.
3. American Geriatrics Society 2019 Updated Beers Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Apr;67(4):674-694.

This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

Related articles

Open language-specific specialty feeds and department pages.

Bridging Evidence-Based and Personalized Medicine in Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies: Balancing Standardization with IndividualizationThis article explores the integration of evidence-based medicine and personalized approaches in managing heart failure and inherited cardiomyopathies, proposing a framework to optimize patient care by harmonizing standardized guidelines witSep 17, 2026Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Metabolomic Insights into Heart Failure ImprovementThis study reveals how cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves left ventricular function in heart failure patients and modulates systemic metabolomic profiles, highlighting differences between ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathSep 15, 2026Heart Failure in Portuguese Adults Aged 50 and Above: Insights from the PORTHOS Study on Prevalence and Predominant PhenotypesThe PORTHOS study reveals a 16.5% prevalence of heart failure among Portuguese adults aged 50+, with HFpEF constituting over 90% of cases, mostly undiagnosed, highlighting the need for enhanced screening strategies in aging populations.Sep 15, 2026
Loading comments...
MedXY briefing

Get the free newsletter

Evidence-led clinical news, trends, and analysis—delivered to your inbox.

Ask MedXY AI

Most popular

Intimate Health
Five Benefits for Women Continuing Sexual Activity After Menopause
Intimate Health
Why Some Women Have a Strong Sex Drive—And Why Men Shouldn't Worry About It
Nursing & care
How often should a couple have sex?
Intimate Health
Classic Intimacy Recommendations: How to Help Women Reach Orgasm and Enjoy Mutual Pleasure
Intimate Health
What Makes a Woman "Physiologically Addicted" Is Never Money, But These Two Relationship Qualities
© 2026 MedXY
Contact usAbout usPrivacy PolicyMedXY story
Genetic Insights into Early Heart Failure Risk in Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome: Findings from the NC-DEFINE Study
A prospective study reveals that ultra-rare cardiomyopathy gene variants significantly increase risk for early heart failure in infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome, highlighting potential for genetic risk stratification and precisi
Sep 12, 2026
Advancing Prognostic Precision in HFpEF: The LIFE-Preserved Risk Prediction ModelThe LIFE-Preserved model accurately predicts short-term and lifetime risks of heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death in HFpEF patients, enabling tailored clinical risk stratification and improved management.Sep 11, 2026
Targeting the CXCL9/CXCL10-CXCR3+ CD8+ T Cell Axis: Unraveling Anti-PD-1 Antibody-Associated Cardiotoxicity in Pressure Overload Heart FailureAnti-PD-1 antibody exacerbates pressure overload-induced heart failure by promoting CXCR3+ CD8+ T cell infiltration, which impairs cardiomyocyte mitochondrial function via granzyme B and perforin. This study identifies a novel immunopathogeSep 6, 2026