We use cookies

Our website uses essential cookies and, with your consent, additional cookies to measure performance and improve our services. Cookie Policy.

You can change your choice at any time.

MMedXYNews
HomeVideos
MedXY AI/MedXY News/Section: Cardiology

Transportation Noise and Heart Disease: Updated Evidence and Implications from a 2025 Meta-Analysis

MedXY Editorial Team•Oct 23, 2025•Cardiology
environmental healthepidemiologyheart disease

Highlight

  • Updated meta-analysis incorporating studies up to 2023 quantifies associations between transportation noise and ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure.
  • Long-term road and aircraft noise exposures are linked with increased risk of heart disease incidence; all transportation noise sources correlate with elevated heart disease mortality.
  • Refined exposure–response curves start between 32 to 45 dB Lden; effect estimates are higher with precise noise exposure assessment and among older adults.
  • Findings support targeted public health interventions and noise mitigation policies, particularly in European populations.

Background and Disease Burden

Chronic exposure to environmental noise from transportation sources — including road traffic, railways, and aircraft — has long been hypothesized to contribute to cardiovascular disease (CVD) through mechanisms such as stress induction, sleep disturbance, and autonomic dysfunction. Cardiovascular diseases remain a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, and identifying modifiable environmental risk factors is critical for disease prevention. Despite previous reviews, including the influential 2018 World Health Organization (WHO) Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region, there remain uncertainties concerning the quantitative relationships between specific transportation noise exposures and cardiovascular outcomes such as ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure. With the proliferation of epidemiological studies employing improved exposure assessment methods in recent years, there is a need to revisit and refine these associations to better inform public health policy and clinical risk stratification.

Study Design and Methodology

This systematic review and meta-analysis by Minkin et al. synthesized epidemiological evidence published up to December 2023, updating the evidence base that previously informed the 2018 WHO guidelines. The review employed consistent search strategies, study inclusion criteria, risk of bias assessments, and quality evaluations as in the original WHO systematic review for comparability. Included studies assessed long-term exposure to transportation noise quantified via Lden (day-evening-night noise level) metrics at the most-exposed façade, focusing on clinically significant cardiovascular outcomes defined by ICD-10 codes: ischemic heart disease (I20-I25), atrial fibrillation (I48), and heart failure (I50).

The review encompassed 53 studies from 15 countries, predominantly European (87%), including 35 studies on heart disease incidence, 28 on mortality, and 5 on prevalence. Pooled relative risks (RRs) per 10 dB Lden increments were estimated separately for road, railway, aircraft noise, and combined sources using random-effects meta-analyses. Meta-regression analyses explored heterogeneity sources and the impact of exposure assignment precision, differentiating noise exposure assessed at residential address and floor height versus coarser spatial grids.

Key Findings

The meta-analysis revealed statistically significant positive associations between long-term transportation noise exposure and heart disease outcomes:

  • Incidence: Road traffic noise was associated with increased heart disease incidence (RR 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.04 per 10 dB Lden), as was aircraft noise, though the latter was borderline (RR 1.03; 95% CI, 0.99–1.07).
  • Mortality: Long-term exposure to road (RR 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01–1.05), railway (RR 1.02; 95% CI, 1.02–1.03), and aircraft noise (RR 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01–1.14) was linked with increased heart disease mortality.
  • After excluding small-area studies from analysis, effect estimates for aircraft noise attenuated to null for incidence and reduced for mortality, suggesting potential regional or population heterogeneity.
  • When pooling all transportation noise sources, RRs of about 1.03 (incidence) and 1.03 (mortality) per 10 dB Lden increase were consistent.
  • The exposure-response curves consistently began between 32 to 45 dB Lden, depending on noise source and cardiovascular outcome, highlighting a threshold for adverse health effects.
  • Studies focusing on older adults and those with more precise noise exposure assignment methods suggested higher effect sizes, underscoring the importance of accurate exposure modelling.

These findings represent both a quantitative and qualitative enhancement over earlier evidence by expanding the range of exposures studied and refining risk estimates.

Expert Commentary

This updated meta-analysis solidifies the evidence linking transportation noise and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, reaffirming the necessity for environmental noise to be recognized as a significant non-traditional cardiovascular risk factor. The magnitude of relative risks, although modest, carries large public health implications given the ubiquity of transportation noise exposure.

From a mechanistic perspective, noise exposure is thought to provoke sympathetic nervous system activation, oxidative stress, systemic inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction, all pathways integral to cardiovascular pathogenesis. The higher effect sizes observed in studies with precise exposure assessment at dwelling level and floor height emphasize the importance of granular noise mapping to adequately capture individual exposure and risk.

Limitations of these studies include residual confounding from socioeconomic factors and air pollution, potential exposure misclassification, and the generalizability primarily to European populations. Furthermore, variability in study designs and population characteristics contributes to between-study heterogeneity, which meta-regression partly elucidated.

Future research should prioritize longitudinal cohorts with standardized noise and health outcome definitions and extend investigations to non-European settings to enhance global relevance.

Conclusion and Clinical Implications

This comprehensive update of the epidemiological evidence highlights significant associations between long-term transportation noise exposure and cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality, particularly for road and aircraft noise. The quantified exposure–response relationships starting from relatively low noise levels (32 to 45 dB Lden) provide a refined framework for health impact assessments and noise regulation policies in Europe.

Clinicians should recognize environmental noise as an emerging modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and advocate for noise mitigation strategies within public health agendas. Policymakers are urged to incorporate these updated findings into environmental noise guidelines to reduce the cardiovascular disease burden.

Improved noise exposure assessment methodologies should be standard in future epidemiological studies to inform precise risk stratification and targeted interventions, ultimately contributing to cardiovascular disease prevention on population and individual levels.

Funding and Registration

This study, published in Environmental International, was supported by relevant institutional and governmental public health funding bodies. There was no clinical trial registration as this was a systematic review and meta-analysis.

References

Minkin M, Woodland L, Williams OA, Hamilton S, Hansell AL, Vienneau D, Gong X, Fenech B. Revisiting the association between transportation noise and heart disease reported in the World Health Organization Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Int. 2025 Aug;202:109667. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109667. Epub 2025 Jul 13. PMID: 40700954.

World Health Organization. Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region. WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2018.

Dzhambov AM, Dimitrova DD. Environmental noise and cardiovascular diseases: Current evidence and new perspectives. J Clin Hypertens. 2021;23(3):536–544. doi:10.1111/jch.14150

Foraster M, Basagaña X, Aguilera I, et al. Traffic noise exposure and cardiovascular mortality: a cohort study and meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 2018;126(7):077007. doi:10.1289/EHP139

Babisch W. Updated exposure-response relationship between road traffic noise and coronary heart diseases: a meta-analysis. Noise Health. 2014;16(68):1–9.

This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

Related articles

Open language-specific specialty feeds and department pages.

Global Burden of Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction: Insights from Rome V Versus Rome IV CriteriaThe Rome V global epidemiology survey confirms a high prevalence of disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) worldwide, consistent with prior Rome IV findings, underscoring a significant and persistent global clinical burden.Sep 15, 2026Advancing SGLT Inhibitor Use for Heart and Kidney Protection in Type 1 Diabetes: Opportunities and ChallengesThis article reviews expert perspectives on the efficacy and safety of SGLT inhibitors for cardiovascular and renal disease in type 1 diabetes, outlines translational insights from type 2 diabetes data, and proposes a roadmap for regulatorySep 15, 2026Heart Failure in Portuguese Adults Aged 50 and Above: Insights from the PORTHOS Study on Prevalence and Predominant PhenotypesThe PORTHOS study reveals a 16.5% prevalence of heart failure among Portuguese adults aged 50+, with HFpEF constituting over 90% of cases, mostly undiagnosed, highlighting the need for enhanced screening strategies in aging populations.Sep 15, 2026
Loading comments...
MedXY briefing

Get the free newsletter

Evidence-led clinical news, trends, and analysis—delivered to your inbox.

Ask MedXY AI

Most popular

Intimate Health
Five Benefits for Women Continuing Sexual Activity After Menopause
Intimate Health
Why Some Women Have a Strong Sex Drive—And Why Men Shouldn't Worry About It
Nursing & care
How often should a couple have sex?
Intimate Health
Classic Intimacy Recommendations: How to Help Women Reach Orgasm and Enjoy Mutual Pleasure
Intimate Health
What Makes a Woman "Physiologically Addicted" Is Never Money, But These Two Relationship Qualities
© 2026 MedXY
Contact usAbout usPrivacy PolicyMedXY story
Evolving Epidemiology and Survival Trends in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Insights from SEER 2000-2021
Analysis of SEER data from 2000-2021 reveals incidence, survival trends, and demographic disparities in US patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, highlighting improved outcomes particularly in primary myelofibrosis and areas for furthe
Sep 13, 2026
High Pesticide Exposure Events and Olfactory Dysfunction: Integrating Subjective and Objective Evidence from Agricultural CohortsEmerging evidence links high pesticide exposure events (HPEEs) in farmers to increased self-reported olfactory dysfunction, though objective smell testing yields inconclusive associations, highlighting critical gaps and methodological consiSep 13, 2026
Incidence, Survival, and Symptomatology of Recurrence in Vulvar Cancer: Insights from Population-Based Cohort Studies and Contemporary EvidenceVulvar cancer exhibits significant recurrence rates, predominantly local, with survival declining sharply after recurrence. Awareness of recurrence-associated symptoms enhances early detection. Surgery remains pivotal in management, with frSep 12, 2026