Comparative Efficacy of Vascular Closure Strategies After TF-TAVI: Insights from ACCESS-TAVI and CHOICE-CLOSURE Trials
Study Background and Disease Burden
Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI) is a widely adopted minimally invasive treatment for severe aortic stenosis, particularly in elderly or high-risk surgical patients. Despite marked advances, access site-related vascular complications remain an important cause of morbidity and mortality, affecting patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilization. Reliable and efficient vascular closure techniques are vital to minimizing bleeding and vascular complications following femoral artery access. Vascular closure devices (VCDs) employ either suture-based, plug-based, or combined mechanisms to achieve hemostasis. However, randomized data comparing various closure strategies remain scarce, limiting evidence-based decisions for optimal access management after TF-TAVI.
Study Design
Sign in free to continue reading
Create or use your MedXY account to unlock the complete article.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.