Introduction and Context
In the field of internal medicine, evidence-based practice has long been synonymous with the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and large-scale meta-analyses. While these quantitative methods are essential for determining *what* works in clinical care, they often fall short of explaining *why* certain interventions succeed or fail in the real world. As healthcare shifts toward patient-centered and value-based models, there is an urgent need to capture the perspectives of those on the front lines: patients, their families, and the clinicians providing care.
Qualitative research fills this critical gap. By utilizing interviews, focus groups, and observational techniques, researchers can explore the complex social, cultural, and behavioral factors that influence health outcomes. However, internal medicine investigators often face challenges in applying these methods with the same level of rigor expected in clinical trials. To address this, a new expert consensus published in the *Journal of General Internal Medicine* (2026) provides a comprehensive framework for designing, implementing, and reporting qualitative research within clinical and health services contexts.
