We use cookies

Our website uses essential cookies and, with your consent, additional cookies to measure performance and improve our services. Cookie Policy.

You can change your choice at any time.

MMedXYNews
HomeVideos
MedXY AI/MedXY News/Section: Clinical Updates

Low-Dose Hydrocortisone in Cirrhotic Patients With Septic Shock: A Double-Blind Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial

MedXY Editorial Team•Oct 1, 2025•Clinical Updates
cirrhosishydrocortisonerandomized controlled trialseptic shockvasopressors

Background and Aims

Septic shock is a critical condition characterized by severe infection leading to circulatory and cellular metabolism abnormalities, resulting in high mortality. In this context, steroid supplementation has been investigated as a potential therapy to improve outcomes. However, its use remains controversial due to inconsistent results across heterogeneous patient populations. Cirrhotic patients experiencing septic shock often develop relative adrenal insufficiency, which manifests as a poor response to vasopressors and worsened prognosis. This subgroup may particularly benefit from early administration of low-dose hydrocortisone, which could help reverse shock and reduce mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of low-dose hydrocortisone in improving survival and shock resolution in cirrhotic patients with septic shock.

Methods

This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter trial conducted in adult patients with cirrhosis admitted to intensive care units with septic shock. Patients were randomized to receive intravenous hydrocortisone—initially 100 mg bolus followed by a continuous infusion of 200 mg over 24 hours—or placebo. Treatment lasted for a minimum of 3 days, followed by a tapering period of 3 to 7 days depending on the timing of shock resolution. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 28 days post-enrollment. Secondary endpoints included shock resolution rate, time to shock resolution, incidence of shock relapse, new shock episodes, and superinfections during hospitalization. Safety assessments focused on metabolic disturbances such as hypo- and hyperglycemia.

Results

The trial was terminated early after enrolling 83 patients due to slow recruitment. Most patients required low-to-moderate doses of vasopressors. Analysis showed no statistically significant difference in 28-day mortality between the hydrocortisone group (35%) and placebo group (39.5%) (p=0.84). Shock resolution rates were also similar (85% vs. 72.1%; p=0.25), as was the median time to shock resolution—3 days (interquartile range [IQR] 2.2 to 4) in the hydrocortisone group versus 4 days (IQR 2 to 7.5) in placebo. Notably, a higher proportion of patients receiving placebo died from refractory shock (47.6%) compared to those receiving hydrocortisone (8.7%). There were no significant differences between groups in the frequency of shock relapse, new shock episodes, or bacterial and fungal superinfections during hospitalization. Hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia events were more common in the hydrocortisone-treated patients.

Multivariate analysis identified the severity of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) at inclusion and inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy as independent predictors of 28-day mortality (hazard ratio 6.40; 95% confidence interval 3.21–12.79).

Conclusions

Supplemental low-dose hydrocortisone did not confer a survival benefit or faster shock resolution in cirrhotic patients with septic shock who required low-to-moderate vasopressor support. Although hydrocortisone was associated with more frequent glycemic disturbances, it may reduce deaths due to refractory shock. The findings underscore the importance of managing ACLF severity and ensuring appropriate antibiotic therapy to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Clinical Implications and Future Directions

The management of septic shock in cirrhotic patients remains challenging. This study suggests that routine administration of low-dose hydrocortisone is not effective for improving short-term mortality or accelerating shock reversal in patients with low-to-moderate vasopressor requirements. However, the potential benefit in reducing refractory shock mortality warrants further investigation. Future research should explore patient subgroups, dosing strategies, and timing of corticosteroid therapy, as well as integrated approaches addressing liver failure and infection control to optimize outcomes.

Trial Registration and Reference

This trial was registered with the University Hospitals Leuven (S55168), EUDRACT (2010-024273-38), and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02602210).

Reference:
Meersseman P, Hernández-Tejero M, Diaz JM, et al. Low-Dose Hydrocortisone in Cirrhotic Patients With Septic Shock: A Double-Blind Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial. Liver Int. 2025 Sep;45(9):e70257. doi:10.1111/liv.70257. PMID: 40757786; PMCID: PMC12320571.

This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

Related articles

Open language-specific specialty feeds and department pages.

Enhancing Survivorship: Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Improves Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery PatientsRESTORE II RCT demonstrates that a 12-week multidisciplinary rehabilitation program significantly improves cardiorespiratory fitness in survivors of upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery, supporting its integration in post-oncologic care.Sep 17, 2026Harnessing Multidomain Baseline Metrics to Predict Attrition in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Offloading TrialsBaseline clinical, functional, and psychosocial metrics predict participant attrition in diabetic foot ulcer offloading device trials; integration via risk visualization enhances retention strategies and highlights technology benefits.Sep 8, 2026Negative Pressure Therapy in Major Lower Extremity Amputation: A Critical Review of Current Randomized Controlled TrialsThis review synthesizes evidence from recent randomized controlled trials assessing negative pressure therapy (NPT) for reducing wound complications after major lower extremity amputation, highlighting variable efficacy and potential benefiSep 5, 2026
Loading comments...
MedXY briefing

Get the free newsletter

Evidence-led clinical news, trends, and analysis—delivered to your inbox.

Ask MedXY AI

Most popular

Intimate Health
Five Benefits for Women Continuing Sexual Activity After Menopause
Intimate Health
Why Some Women Have a Strong Sex Drive—And Why Men Shouldn't Worry About It
Nursing & care
How often should a couple have sex?
Intimate Health
Classic Intimacy Recommendations: How to Help Women Reach Orgasm and Enjoy Mutual Pleasure
Intimate Health
What Makes a Woman "Physiologically Addicted" Is Never Money, But These Two Relationship Qualities
© 2026 MedXY
Contact usAbout usPrivacy PolicyMedXY story
Enhancing Sexual and Pelvic Health in Women: Efficacy of Scheduled Vibrator Use in a Randomized Controlled Trial
Scheduled vibrator use combined with educational support significantly improves sexual function in women with sexual dysfunction and pelvic floor disorders compared to education alone.
Sep 5, 2026
Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy-Guided Exclusion Diet Fails to Improve IBS Symptoms in Controlled TrialA randomized controlled crossover trial found that individualized exclusion diets based on confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) findings do not significantly improve symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients compared to sham diets.Sep 5, 2026
Septic Shock in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplant Recipients: Outcomes, Prognostic Factors, and Clinical Implications from a Multicenter ICU CohortSeptic shock following allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation has a high 90-day mortality rate of 63%, strongly influenced by illness severity, fungal infection, and neutropenia. Early aminoglycoside use shows complex associatioSep 3, 2026