Urgent Surgery Versus Fibrinolytic Therapy in Left-Sided Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis: Insights from a Groundbreaking Randomized Trial
Highlight
- This landmark randomized controlled trial (RCT) is the first to directly compare urgent surgery versus fibrinolytic therapy (FT) using low-dose, slow-infusion tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) for symptomatic left-sided prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT).
- The study found no significant difference in complete clinical response between urgent surgery and fibrinolysis but reported significantly higher composite adverse events — particularly death — associated with surgery.
- Fibrinolytic therapy, while safer, was associated with a notable proportion of residual valve dysfunction post-treatment.
Study Background and Disease Burden
MedXY registered readers
Sign in free to continue reading
Create or use your MedXY account to unlock the complete article.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.