We use cookies

Our website uses essential cookies and, with your consent, additional cookies to measure performance and improve our services. Cookie Policy.

You can change your choice at any time.

MMedXYNews
HomeVideos
MedXY AI/MedXY News/Section: Clinical Updates

Breastfeeding After Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Insights From the POSITIVE Trial

MedXY Editorial Team•Oct 7, 2025•Clinical Updates
BreastfeedingPregnancy

Highlight

– Two thirds of women with early HR+ breast cancer breastfed after live birth post-cancer diagnosis.
– Breastfeeding duration exceeded 4 months in over half of participants.
– No increased short-term risk of breast cancer events was observed among breastfeeding women.
– Breastfeeding rates were higher among women >35 years and those without previous children.

Study Background and Disease Burden

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy in women worldwide, with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) subtype representing a large portion. Increasing numbers of young women survive early-stage HR+ BC and seek to conceive and breastfeed after their diagnosis. However, clinical guidance on the safety of breastfeeding after HR+ BC is limited due to concerns about cancer recurrence and the hormonal milieu of lactation potentially stimulating residual tumor cells. Endocrine therapy (ET), a cornerstone of HR+ BC treatment, is often paused to allow pregnancy, but the impact of breastfeeding in this context remains underexplored. This generates uncertainty for survivors about pursuing motherhood and infant feeding choices post-treatment, underscoring an unmet clinical need for evidence-based recommendations.

Study Design

The POSITIVE trial is a prospective international multicenter study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02308085) that enrolled women with early HR+ BC who interrupted ET to attempt pregnancy. This trial was designed primarily to assess the safety of ET interruption on breast cancer recurrence risk. The current analysis focuses on women who had a live birth during the study. It describes breastfeeding patterns including frequency, duration, and laterality (whether breastfeeding from one or both breasts) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or unilateral mastectomy. Additionally, it compares the cumulative incidence of breast cancer events between women who breastfed versus those who did not, over a median follow-up of 41 months.

Key Findings

Among 317 women with at least one live birth, 313 were eligible for breastfeeding analysis. A majority, 196 (62.6%), breastfed their infants. Breastfeeding frequency varied according to surgical history: 77.8% of women who had BCS breastfed and, notably, 69.2% of these women breastfed only from the unaffected breast. Among the 146 women who underwent unilateral mastectomy, 45.2% breastfed.

Breastfeeding was significantly more common among women aged over 35 years (67.6% vs. 55.7%) and those without previous children (66.4% vs. 48.5%). Duration of breastfeeding was encouragingly sustained, with a median of 4.4 months and over half (52.6%) breastfeeding for more than 4 months.

Regarding breast cancer outcomes, the cumulative incidence of breast cancer events at 24 months post-first on-study live birth was 3.6% in breastfeeding women and 3.1% in non-breastfeeding women, a negligible difference of 0.5% (95% CI, -4.3% to 5.2%). This indicates no significant short-term increase in breast cancer recurrence associated with breastfeeding after ET interruption and live birth in HR+ BC survivors.

Expert Commentary

The POSITIVE trial extends critical insights for clinicians counseling premenopausal women with HR+ breast cancer who desire pregnancy and breastfeeding. Breastfeeding is not only feasible for a substantial proportion of women post-treatment but does not appear to elevate near-term BC recurrence risk. The ability to breastfeed predominantly from the unaffected breast after BCS or even after unilateral mastectomy is reassuring.

These findings align with biological understanding that once ET is resumed post-lactation, the endocrine environment returns to suppressed levels. While longer-term data are awaited, this study challenges historic caution about breastfeeding after HR+ BC, supporting individualized shared decision-making regarding reproductive health.

Study limitations include the relatively short follow-up and the observational nature of breastfeeding behaviors, which may be confounded by patient preference and clinical advice. The trial population, highly motivated to pursue pregnancy, may not fully represent all HR+ BC survivors.

Conclusion

The POSITIVE trial demonstrates that among women with early HR+ breast cancer who interrupt ET to achieve pregnancy, two thirds successfully breastfeed for a median duration exceeding four months. Crucially, no excess risk of breast cancer events in the short term was observed linked to breastfeeding. These results provide pivotal evidence supporting breastfeeding as a safe option, empowering BC survivors who desire motherhood to make informed choices concerning lactation without compromising oncologic outcomes. Ongoing follow-up will clarify longer-term safety and guide future practice.

References

Peccatori FA, Niman SM, Partridge AH, et al. Breastfeeding After Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Results From the POSITIVE Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(24):2712-2719. doi:10.1200/JCO-24-02697.

This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

Related articles

Open language-specific specialty feeds and department pages.

Understanding HPA-1a Alloimmunisation in Pregnancy: Insights from a Multi-Ethnic Prospective StudyThis study reveals the population prevalence and incident risk of HPA-1a alloimmunisation in pregnancy across diverse ethnic groups, highlighting its rarity and establishing a framework for risk assessment in foetal-neonatal alloimmune throSep 17, 2026Psychostimulant Continuation and Postpartum Mental Health in Pregnant People With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Clinical Evidence ReviewThis review synthesizes current evidence on the impact of continuing psychostimulant treatment during pregnancy on postpartum mental health outcomes among people with ADHD, highlighting key findings and clinical implications from recent larSep 9, 2026Antiseizure Medication Use During Pregnancy: Implications for Fetal Growth from the EURAP RegistryA comprehensive cohort study from the EURAP registry reveals that antiseizure medication, especially polytherapy and certain monotherapies, increases the risk of poor fetal growth, underscoring the need for optimized treatment strategies duSep 5, 2026
Loading comments...
MedXY briefing

Get the free newsletter

Evidence-led clinical news, trends, and analysis—delivered to your inbox.

Ask MedXY AI

Most popular

Intimate Health
Five Benefits for Women Continuing Sexual Activity After Menopause
Intimate Health
Why Some Women Have a Strong Sex Drive—And Why Men Shouldn't Worry About It
Nursing & care
How often should a couple have sex?
Intimate Health
Classic Intimacy Recommendations: How to Help Women Reach Orgasm and Enjoy Mutual Pleasure
Intimate Health
What Makes a Woman "Physiologically Addicted" Is Never Money, But These Two Relationship Qualities
© 2026 MedXY
Contact usAbout usPrivacy PolicyMedXY story
Balancing Maternal Mental Health and Fetal Safety: Insights on Depression and SSRI Use During Pregnancy
This article reviews the complex interplay between major depressive disorder during pregnancy and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment, highlighting the importance of prioritizing maternal mental health to optimize outcomes for
Aug 18, 2026
Impact of Texas Abortion Ban on Critical Illness in Hospitalized Pregnant Women: A Retrospective Cohort AnalysisThe Texas Senate Bill 8 abortion ban is linked to an increased rate of critical illness, sepsis, and infections among hospitalized pregnant women with high-risk features, highlighting significant implications for maternal healthcare in restAug 18, 2026
Exploring the Impact of Multiple Pregnancies on Subclinical Left Ventricular Function in Healthy WomenThis study reveals that higher parity is associated with subtle reductions in myocardial strain during pregnancy, suggesting cumulative cardiovascular effects despite normal ejection fraction.Aug 18, 2026